Effect of orthodontic adhesive thickness on force required by debonding pliers.
نویسندگان
چکیده
This in vitro study evaluated the relationship between removal force and the thickness of three orthodontic adhesives, namely, light- and chemical-cured resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. The thickness of each adhesive was 50, 100, 150, or 200 µm, and all adhesives were bonded on bovine incisors. Removal force was measured before (TC-0) and after 1,000 thermal cycles (TC-1000), and values were compared. At TC-0, the removal strengths for adhesive thicknesses of 50 and 100 µm were significantly lower than those for thicknesses of 150 and 200 µm (P < 0.05). At TC-1000, removal strengths for adhesive thicknesses of 50 and 100 µm were also significantly lower than those for 150 and 200 µm. Superbond Orthomite specimens showed a significant difference in removal strength between TC-0 and TC-1000 (P < 0.05) at all thicknesses. There was no significant difference in the distribution of adhesive remnant index scores at any thickness. These findings indicate that decreasing the thickness of applied orthodontic adhesive reduces the removal strength required.
منابع مشابه
The Effects of Composite Resin Types and Debonding Pliers on the Amount of Adhesive Remnants and Enamel Damages: A Stereomicroscopic Evaluation
Background and aims. This in vitro study was designed to evaluate the effect of composite resin types and orthodontic debonding pliers on the amount of adhesive remnants and enamel damages using a novel method of measurement. Materials and methods. 120 extracted human premolars were randomly divided into four groups (n = 30). The standard edgewise metallic brackets were bonded to the teeth with...
متن کاملبررسی تأثیر دو نوع ادهزیو و دو نوع وسیله دی باندینگ بر میزان ادهزیو باقیمانده بر روی مینای دندان
Background and Aim: At the end of fixed orthodontic treatment, enamel damages are affected by amount of adhesive remnants. Thus, determining the factors involves in the amount of adhesive remnants e.g. the types of resins and the methods used for debonding is of necessity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the composite resin type and debonding pliers on enamel surface by a ne...
متن کاملThe force levels required to mechanically debond ceramic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.
The in vitro force levels generated by four differing methods of mechanical debonding techniques for ceramic brackets, using debonding pliers, were measured. The forces generated using wide (method W) and narrow blades (method N) were compared with those generated using a diagonally opposite corner application of the wide blades (method C) and incisal-gingival application of a pair of pointed b...
متن کاملEnamel bonding of self-etching and phosphoric acid-etching orthodontic adhesives in simulated clinical conditions: debonding force and enamel surface.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of self-etching and phosphoric acid-etching orthodontic adhesives for enamel bonding in simulated clinical conditions. By using two self-etching (Transbond Plus, TP; Beauty Ortho Bond, BB) and two acid-etching (Transbond XT, TX; Superbond Orthomite, SB) adhesives, orthodontic brackets were bonded on human premolars (n=10 for each adhesive). Ten tee...
متن کاملEnamel Surface Roughness after Orthodontic Bracket Debonding and Composite Resin Removal by Two Types of Burs
Objective: Increased enamel surface roughness following orthodontic bracket debonding leads to increased plaque accumulation and enamel decalcification. Therefore, different methods are employed to achieve smoother enamel surfaces after bracket debonding. This study compared enamel surface roughness following orthodontic bracket debonding and composite resin removal using white stone and tung...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of oral science
دوره 56 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014